↓ Skip to main content

A New Criterion for Demarcating Life from Non-Life

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A New Criterion for Demarcating Life from Non-Life
Published in
Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11084-013-9352-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. H. van Hateren

Abstract

Criteria for demarcating life from non-life are important for deciding whether new candidate systems, either discovered extraterrestrially or constructed in the laboratory, are genuinely alive or not. They are also important for understanding the origin of life and its evolution. Current criteria are either too restrictive or too extensive. The new criterion proposed here poses that a system is living when it is capable of utilizing active causation, at evolutionary or behavioural timescales. Active causation is produced when the organism uses an estimate of its own Darwinian fitness to modulate the variance of stochasticity that drives hereditary or behavioural changes. The changes are subsequently fed back to the fitness estimate and used in the next cycle of a feedback loop. The ability to use a self-estimated fitness in this way is an evolved property of the organism, and the way in which fitness is estimated is therefore controlled and stabilized by Darwinian evolution. The hereditary and behavioural trajectories resulting from this mechanism combine predictability with unpredictability, and the mechanism produces a form of self-directed agency in living organisms that is absent from non-living systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 24 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 37%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Chemistry 5 17%
Physics and Astronomy 3 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,565,843
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#72
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,460
of 318,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them