↓ Skip to main content

Progression of volume load and muscular adaptation during resistance exercise

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
video
12 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
Title
Progression of volume load and muscular adaptation during resistance exercise
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00421-010-1735-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. Peterson, Emidio Pistilli, G. Gregory Haff, Eric P. Hoffman, Paul M. Gordon

Abstract

Volume load (VL) is suggested to influence the adaptation of muscle to resistance exercise (RE). We sought to examine the independent association between total VL and hypertrophy and strength following a progressive RE protocol of equated sets and intensity. Total VL was calculated in 83 subjects (n = 43 males, n = 40 females; age = 25.12 ± 5.5 years) who participated in unilateral arm RE for 12 weeks. Subjects were tested for biceps muscle volume (MRI of the upper arm), isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and dynamic biceps strength (1RM), at baseline and following RE. Linear regression analysis revealed that sex was a significant predictor of hypertrophy (β = 0.06; p = 0.01) and strength (β = 0.14; p = 0.04), and that males had greater increases. Total VL was independently associated with hypertrophy only among females (β = 0.12; p < 0.01). For males, only baseline strength was (inversely) related to hypertrophy (β = -0.12; p = 0.04). VL was strongly associated with changes in 1RM strength improvement for both males (β = 0.66; p < 0.01) and females (β = 0.26; p = 0.02), but only related to MVC among females (β = 0.20; p = 0.02). Findings reveal that VL was independently associated with hypertrophy only among females. For males baseline strength was independently and inversely related to changes in muscle mass. Conversely, VL was found to be strongly associated with changes in 1RM for both males and females, controlling for age, body mass, and baseline strength.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 236 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 18%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Researcher 15 6%
Professor 12 5%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 97 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#305,221
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#65
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,178
of 190,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.