| Title |
Evaluating the effects of the Lunchtime Enjoyment Activity and Play (LEAP) school playground intervention on children’s quality of life, enjoyment and participation in physical activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-164 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brendon P Hyndman, Amanda C Benson, Shahid Ullah, Amanda Telford |
| Abstract |
An emerging public health strategy is to enhance children's opportunities to be physically active during school break periods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the Lunchtime Enjoyment Activity and Play (LEAP) school playground intervention on primary school children's quality of life (QOL), enjoyment and participation in physical activity (PA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 38% |
| Australia | 9 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 74% |
| Scientists | 7 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 37 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 33 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 7% |
| Psychology | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#343,616
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#309
of 17,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,298
of 331,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#6
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.