↓ Skip to main content

Preterm birth, infant weight gain, and childhood asthma risk: A meta-analysis of 147,000 European children

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preterm birth, infant weight gain, and childhood asthma risk: A meta-analysis of 147,000 European children
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnes M.M. Sonnenschein-van der Voort, Lidia R. Arends, Johan C. de Jongste, Isabella Annesi-Maesano, S. Hasan Arshad, Henrique Barros, Mikel Basterrechea, Hans Bisgaard, Leda Chatzi, Eva Corpeleijn, Sofia Correia, Leone C. Craig, Graham Devereux, Cristian Dogaru, Miroslav Dostal, Karel Duchen, Merete Eggesbø, C. Kors van der Ent, Maria P. Fantini, Francesco Forastiere, Urs Frey, Ulrike Gehring, Davide Gori, Anne C. van der Gugten, Wojciech Hanke, A. John Henderson, Barbara Heude, Carmen Iñiguez, Hazel M. Inskip, Thomas Keil, Cecily C. Kelleher, Manolis Kogevinas, Eskil Kreiner-Møller, Claudia E. Kuehni, Leanne K. Küpers, Kinga Lancz, Pernille S. Larsen, Susanne Lau, Johnny Ludvigsson, Monique Mommers, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Lubica Palkovicova, Katharine C. Pike, Costanza Pizzi, Kinga Polanska, Daniela Porta, Lorenzo Richiardi, Graham Roberts, Anne Schmidt, Radim J. Sram, Jordi Sunyer, Carel Thijs, Maties Torrent, Karien Viljoen, Alet H. Wijga, Martine Vrijheid, Vincent W.V. Jaddoe, Liesbeth Duijts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 352 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 81 22%
Unknown 83 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 6%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 102 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,826,945
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1,517
of 11,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,052
of 334,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#29
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.