↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity and the endocannabinoid system: an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Physical activity and the endocannabinoid system: an overview
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00018-014-1575-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirko Tantimonaco, Roberta Ceci, Stefania Sabatini, Maria Valeria Catani, Antonello Rossi, Valeria Gasperi, Mauro Maccarrone

Abstract

Recognized as a "disease modifier", physical activity (PA) is increasingly viewed as a more holistic, cost-saving method for prevention, treatment and management of human disease conditions. The traditional view that PA engages the monoaminergic and endorphinergic systems has been challenged by the discovery of the endocannabinoid system (ECS), composed of endogenous lipids, their target receptors, and metabolic enzymes. Indeed, direct and indirect evidence suggests that the ECS might mediate some of the PA-triggered effects throughout the body. Moreover, it is now emerging that PA itself is able to modulate ECS in different ways. Against this background, in the present review we shall discuss evidence of the cross-talk between PA and the ECS, ranging from brain to peripheral districts and highlighting how ECS must be tightly regulated during PA, in order to maintain its beneficial effects on cognition, mood, and nociception, while avoiding impaired energy metabolism, oxidative stress, and inflammatory processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Psychology 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Neuroscience 15 8%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,053,409
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#91
of 5,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,031
of 327,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.