| Title |
Chemical and Functional Characterization of Kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule) Grain, Extrudate and Bran
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11130-009-0109-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ritva Repo-Carrasco-Valencia, Alexander Acevedo de La Cruz, Julio Cesar Icochea Alvarez, Heikki Kallio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 25% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Professor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 47 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 45 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,531,527
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#257
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,809
of 93,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.