↓ Skip to main content

How expensive is Big Science? Consequences of using simple publication counts in performance assessment of large scientific facilities

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
How expensive is Big Science? Consequences of using simple publication counts in performance assessment of large scientific facilities
Published in
Scientometrics, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1249-z
Authors

Olof Hallonsten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Mexico 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Other 6 16%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 14%
Computer Science 4 11%
Engineering 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#12,893,599
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,630
of 2,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,821
of 222,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.