↓ Skip to main content

Effects of detailed illustrations on science learning: an eye-tracking study

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Effects of detailed illustrations on science learning: an eye-tracking study
Published in
Instructional Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11251-017-9417-1
Authors

Yu Ying Lin, Kenneth Holmqvist, Kiyofumi Miyoshi, Hiroshi Ashida

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 4 5%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 19%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Engineering 6 7%
Computer Science 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#13,043,899
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#213
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,866
of 316,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.