| Title |
Do analgesics improve functioning in patients with chronic low back pain? An explorative triple-blinded RCT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-014-3229-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henrica R. Schiphorst Preuper, Jan H. B. Geertzen, Marten van Wijhe, Anne M. Boonstra, Barbara H. W. Molmans, Pieter U. Dijkstra, Michiel F. Reneman |
| Abstract |
Treatment of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) aims to reduce disability, improve functional capacity, and participation. Time contingent prescription of analgesics is a treatment modality in CLBP. The impact of analgesics on functional capacity is unknown. Aim of the study was to explore the effect of analgesics on functioning measured by functional capacity evaluation, and self-reported disability in patients with CLBP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,041,913
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#422
of 4,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,201
of 337,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#12
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.