| Title |
Space as a Tool for Astrobiology: Review and Recommendations for Experimentations in Earth Orbit and Beyond
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-017-0365-5 |
| Authors |
Hervé Cottin, Julia Michelle Kotler, Daniela Billi, Charles Cockell, René Demets, Pascale Ehrenfreund, Andreas Elsaesser, Louis d’Hendecourt, Jack J. W. A. van Loon, Zita Martins, Silvano Onofri, Richard C. Quinn, Elke Rabbow, Petra Rettberg, Antonio J. Ricco, Klaus Slenzka, Rosa de la Torre, Jean-Pierre de Vera, Frances Westall, Nathalie Carrasco, Aurélien Fresneau, Yuko Kawaguchi, Yoko Kebukawa, Dara Nguyen, Olivier Poch, Kafila Saiagh, Fabien Stalport, Akihiko Yamagishi, Hajime Yano, Benjamin A. Klamm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 11% |
| Engineering | 12 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 28% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,959,935
of 25,248,775 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#116
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,050
of 323,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,248,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.