↓ Skip to main content

Muscle contributions to recovery from forward loss of balance by stepping

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Muscle contributions to recovery from forward loss of balance by stepping
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.047
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F. Graham, Christopher P. Carty, David G. Lloyd, Glen A. Lichtwark, Rod S. Barrett

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the muscular contributions to the stepping phase of recovery from forward loss of balance in 5 young and 5 older adults that were able to recover balance in a single step, and 5 older adults that required multiple steps. Forward loss of balance was achieved by releasing participants from a static forward lean angle. All participants were instructed to attempt to recover balance by taking a rapid single step. A scalable anatomical model consisting of 36 degrees-of-freedom was used to compute kinematics and joint moments from motion capture and force plate data. Forces for 94 muscle actuators were computed using static optimisation and induced acceleration analysis was used to compute individual muscle contributions to net lumbar spine joint, and stepping side hip joint and knee joint accelerations during recovery. Older adults that required multiple recovery steps used a significantly shorter and faster initial recovery step and adopted significantly more trunk flexion throughout recovery compared to the older single steppers. Older multiple steppers also produced significantly more force in the stance side hamstrings, which resulted in significantly higher hamstring induced flexion accelerations at the lumbar spine and extension accelerations at the hip. However since the net joint lumbar spine and hip accelerations remained similar between older multiple steppers and older single steppers, we suggest that the recovery strategy adopted by older multiple steppers was less efficient as well as less effective than for older single steppers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 30 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Sports and Recreations 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 44 38%