You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Retrospective Evaluation of the Global Decline of Carnivores and Ungulates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12249 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. DI MARCO, L. BOITANI, D. MALLON, M. HOFFMANN, A. IACUCCI, E. MEIJAARD, P. VISCONTI, J. SCHIPPER, C. RONDININI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Namibia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 82 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 200 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 96 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 5% |
| Unknown | 73 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,665,258
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,358
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,526
of 327,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#26
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.