↓ Skip to main content

Effect of muscle temperature on leg extension force and short-term power output in humans

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users
patent
36 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
Effect of muscle temperature on leg extension force and short-term power output in humans
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00424812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J. Sargeant

Abstract

The effect of changing muscle temperature on performance of short term dynamic exercise in man was studied. Four subjects performed 20 s maximal sprint efforts at a constant pedalling rate of 95 crank rev.min-1 on an isokinetic cycle ergometer under four temperature conditions: from rest at room temperature; and following 45 min of leg immersion in water baths at 44; 18; and 12 degrees C. Muscle temperature (Tm) at 3 cm depth was respectively 36.6, 39.3, 31.9 and 29.0 degrees C. After warming the legs in a 44 degrees C water bath there was an increase of approximately 11% in maximal peak force and power (PPmax) compared with normal rest while cooling the legs in 18 and 12 degrees C water baths resulted in reductions of approximately 12% and 21% respectively. Associated with an increased maximal peak power at higher Tm was an increased rate of fatigue. Two subjects performed isokinetic cycling at three different pedalling rates (54, 95 and 140 rev.min-1) demonstrating that the magnitude of the temperature effect was velocity dependent: At the slowest pedalling rate the effect of warming the muscle was to increase PPmax by approximately 2% per degree C but at the highest speed this increased to approximately 10% per degree C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 252 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 21%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Researcher 18 7%
Other 15 6%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 58 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 123 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 66 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,669,129
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#537
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173
of 11,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them