↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of High-Avidity Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells with Differential Tetramer Binding Coappearing after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of High-Avidity Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells with Differential Tetramer Binding Coappearing after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, July 2017
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1601992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justyna Ogonek, Kriti Verma, Christian Schultze-Florey, Pavankumar Varanasi, Susanne Luther, Patrick Schweier, Wolfgang Kühnau, Gudrun Göhring, Elke Dammann, Michael Stadler, Arnold Ganser, Ulrike Koehl, Christian Koenecke, Eva M Weissinger, Lothar Hambach

Abstract

CMV reactivation is a major complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Immune reconstitution of CMV-specific CTLs (CMV-CTLs) is essential for virus control. During CMV-CTL monitoring using mutated HLA/CMV tetramers selectively detecting high-avidity T cells, we observed coappearance of CMV-CTLs with low (CMV tet(low) CTLs) and high tetramer binding (CMV tet(high) CTLs) in 53/115 CMV IgG(+) patients stem cell transplanted from CMV IgG(+) donors. However, the relevance of these coappearing differentially tetramer binding ("dual") CMV-CTLs was unclear. In this study, we investigated the kinetics, properties, and clinical impact of coappearing CMV tet(low) and tet(high) CTLs after allogeneic SCT. Patients with dual CMV-CTLs had more CMV tet(high) than tet(low) CTLs. Chimerism analysis of isolated CMV tet(low) and tet(high) CTLs revealed their exclusive donor origin. CMV tet(low) and tet(high) CTLs had an identical effector memory CD45RA(-)CCR7(-) and CD45RA(+)CCR7(-) T cell distribution, equal differentiation, senescence, and exhaustion marker expression and were negative for regulatory CD8(+) T cell markers. Isolated CMV tet(low) and tet(high) CTLs were equally sensitive to CMV peptides in IFN-γ release and cytotoxicity assays. However, CMV tet(high) CTLs proliferated more in response to low CMV peptide concentrations than tet(low) CTLs. TCR repertoire analysis revealed that CMV tet(low) and tet(high) CTLs use different TCRs. Finally, dual CMV-CTLs were not associated with CMV antigenemia. In conclusion, these data show for the first time, to our knowledge, that both CMV tet(low) and tet(high) CTLs are functional effector T cells differing by proliferation, numbers in peripheral blood, and probably by their precursors without increasing the CMV reactivation risk after allogeneic SCT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,329,366
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#24,008
of 27,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,364
of 313,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#161
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.