↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism of resistance to synthetic pyrethroids in buffalo flies in south‐east Queensland

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Veterinary Journal, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanism of resistance to synthetic pyrethroids in buffalo flies in south‐east Queensland
Published in
Australian Veterinary Journal, February 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00685.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

JT Rothwell, JAT Morgan, PJ James, GW Brown, FD Guerrero, WK Jorgensen

Abstract

Resistance to synthetic pyrethroids (SP) was first recorded in buffalo flies in Australia in 1980, associated with previous use of DDT and fenvalerate. By the 1990s, resistance was widespread. Resistance to SP in the related horn fly of the Americas is associated with kdr and super-kdr mutations in a gene encoding for a voltage-gated sodium channel. We describe 7-20-fold resistance to SP in buffalo flies from south-east Queensland, present evidence of flies that are heterozygous resistant at the kdr locus and show an increase in the frequency of the resistant allele 1 month after treatment of cattle with SP.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 33%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 50%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,329,851
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Australian Veterinary Journal
#51
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,551
of 118,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Veterinary Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them