↓ Skip to main content

The Mad Hatter’s corporate tea party

Overview of attention for article published in Managerial Auditing Journal, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mad Hatter’s corporate tea party
Published in
Managerial Auditing Journal, August 2003
DOI 10.1108/02686900310482641
Authors

Philomena Leung, Barry J. Cooper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 4%
Nigeria 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 23 45%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Managerial Auditing Journal
#62
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,765
of 53,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Managerial Auditing Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them