↓ Skip to main content

Stable GaX2, InX2 and TlX2 radicals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemistry, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable GaX2, InX2 and TlX2 radicals
Published in
Nature Chemistry, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/nchem.1870
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrey V. Protchenko, Deepak Dange, Jeffrey R. Harmer, Christina Y. Tang, Andrew D. Schwarz, Michael J. Kelly, Nicholas Phillips, Remi Tirfoin, Krishna Hassomal Birjkumar, Cameron Jones, Nikolas Kaltsoyannis, Philip Mountford, Simon Aldridge

Abstract

The chemistry of the Group 13 metals is dominated by the +1 and +3 oxidation states, and simple monomeric M(II) species are typically short-lived, highly reactive species. Here we report the first thermally robust monomeric MX2 radicals of gallium, indium and thallium. By making use of sterically demanding boryl substituents, compounds of the type M(II)(boryl)2 (M = Ga, In, Tl) can be synthesized. These decompose above 130 °C and are amenable to structural characterization in the solid state by X-ray crystallography. Electron paramagnetic resonance and computational studies reveal a dominant metal-centred character for all three radicals (>70% spin density at the metal). M(II) species have been invoked as key short-lived intermediates in well-known electron-transfer processes; consistently, the chemical behaviour of these novel isolated species reveals facile one-electron shuttling processes at the metal centre.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 29%
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 64 77%
Materials Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,901,101
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemistry
#1,516
of 3,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,217
of 223,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemistry
#29
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.