↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the Impact of Global Climate Change on Potential Natural Vegetation

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Quantifying the Impact of Global Climate Change on Potential Natural Vegetation
Published in
Climatic Change, January 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1005435831549
Authors

Martin T. Sykes, I. Colin Prentice, Fouzia Laarif

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Malaysia 1 2%
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 15%
Professor 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Environmental Science 13 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 21%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,605
of 6,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,052
of 109,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.