You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Hypotheses, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.02.040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Dean, Kate van Dooren, Philip Weinstein |
| Abstract |
Globally, the human and economic burdens of mental illness are increasing. As the prevalence and costs associated with mental illness rise, we are progressively more aware that environmental issues such as climate change and biodiversity loss impact on human health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 364 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 17% |
| Researcher | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 16% |
| Unknown | 75 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 87 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 10% |
| Design | 17 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 100 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#888,843
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Medical Hypotheses
#256
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,107
of 119,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Hypotheses
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.