You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Importance of Baseline Specification in Evaluating Conservation Interventions and Achieving No Net Loss of Biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. W. BULL, A. GORDON, E. A. LAW, K. B. SUTTLE, E. J. MILNER‐GULLAND |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 32% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 114 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,669,499
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,389
of 4,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,154
of 336,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#25
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.