↓ Skip to main content

Influences of Heel Heights on Gait Parameters and Lower-limb Muscle Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influences of Heel Heights on Gait Parameters and Lower-limb Muscle Activity
Published in
Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy, January 2016
DOI 10.9759/hppt.6.133
Authors

Aya Nakajima, Shin Murata, Kouhei Iida, Toshiki Iuchi, Keita Suzuki, Daiki Nakajima, Aoi Nakamura, Kayoko Shiraiwa, Abiko Teppei, Kunihiko Anami, Katsuyuki Madoba, Jun Horie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,256
of 402,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them