↓ Skip to main content

DNA Microarrays: a Powerful Genomic Tool for Biomedical and Clinical Research

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
DNA Microarrays: a Powerful Genomic Tool for Biomedical and Clinical Research
Published in
Molecular Medicine, September 2007
DOI 10.2119/2006-00107.trevino
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Trevino, Francesco Falciani, Hugo A. Barrera-Saldaña

Abstract

Among the many benefits of the Human Genome Project are new and powerful tools such as the genome-wide hybridization devices referred to as microarrays. Initially designed to measure gene transcriptional levels, microarray technologies are now used for comparing other genome features among individuals and their tissues and cells. Results provide valuable information on disease subcategories, disease prognosis, and treatment outcome. Likewise, they reveal differences in genetic makeup, regulatory mechanisms, and subtle variations and move us closer to the era of personalized medicine. To understand this powerful tool, its versatility, and how dramatically it is changing the molecular approach to biomedical and clinical research, this review describes the technology, its applications, a didactic step-by-step review of a typical microarray protocol, and a real experiment. Finally, it calls the attention of the medical community to the importance of integrating multidisciplinary teams to take advantage of this technology and its expanding applications that, in a slide, reveals our genetic inheritance and destiny.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 352 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 25%
Student > Bachelor 62 17%
Student > Master 48 13%
Researcher 33 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 81 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 64 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Computer Science 16 4%
Chemistry 16 4%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 91 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,094,689
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#53
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,549
of 69,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them