↓ Skip to main content

The truth about nutrition in the ICU

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
The truth about nutrition in the ICU
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-3162-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Singer, G. S. Doig, C. Pichard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 11 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,647,929
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,903
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,935
of 301,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.