↓ Skip to main content

BLIND ordering of large-scale transcriptomic developmental timecourses

Overview of attention for article published in Development (09501991), February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BLIND ordering of large-scale transcriptomic developmental timecourses
Published in
Development (09501991), February 2014
DOI 10.1242/dev.105288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leon Anavy, Michal Levin, Sally Khair, Nagayasu Nakanishi, Selene L. Fernandez-Valverde, Bernard M. Degnan, Itai Yanai

Abstract

RNA-Seq enables the efficient transcriptome sequencing of many samples from small amounts of material, but the analysis of these data remains challenging. In particular, in developmental studies, RNA-Seq is challenged by the morphological staging of samples, such as embryos, since these often lack clear markers at any particular stage. In such cases, the automatic identification of the stage of a sample would enable previously infeasible experimental designs. Here we present the 'basic linear index determination of transcriptomes' (BLIND) method for ordering samples comprising different developmental stages. The method is an implementation of a traveling salesman algorithm to order the transcriptomes according to their inter-relationships as defined by principal components analysis. To establish the direction of the ordered samples, we show that an appropriate indicator is the entropy of transcriptomic gene expression levels, which increases over developmental time. Using BLIND, we correctly recover the annotated order of previously published embryonic transcriptomic timecourses for frog, mosquito, fly and zebrafish. We further demonstrate the efficacy of BLIND by collecting 59 embryos of the sponge Amphimedon queenslandica and ordering their transcriptomes according to developmental stage. BLIND is thus useful in establishing the temporal order of samples within large datasets and is of particular relevance to the study of organisms with asynchronous development and when morphological staging is difficult.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 127 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 19%
Computer Science 6 4%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,388,865
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Development (09501991)
#6,921
of 9,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,796
of 322,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development (09501991)
#42
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.