↓ Skip to main content

Impulse dispersion in a tapered granular chain

Overview of attention for article published in Granular Matter, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 145)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Impulse dispersion in a tapered granular chain
Published in
Granular Matter, February 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10035-002-0119-1
Authors

Masami Nakagawa, Juan H. Agui, David T. Wu, David Vivanco Extramiana

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Professor 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 15%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,745,563
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Granular Matter
#21
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,236
of 127,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Granular Matter
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them