You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Views of Young People in Rural Australia on SPARX, a Fantasy World Developed for New Zealand Youth With Depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JMIR Serious Games, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2196/games.3183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colleen Cheek, Heather Bridgman, Theresa Fleming, Elizabeth Cummings, Leonie Ellis, Mathijs FG Lucassen, Matthew Shepherd, Timothy Skinner |
| Abstract |
A randomized control trial demonstrated that a computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) program (Smart, Positive, Active, Realistic, X-factor thoughts [SPARX]) was an appealing and efficacious treatment for depression for adolescents in New Zealand. Little is known about the acceptability of computerized therapy programs for rural Australians and the suitability of computerized programs developed in one cultural context when used in another country. Issues such as accents and local differences in health care access might mean adjustments to programs are required. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 44 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,890,943
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from JMIR Serious Games
#130
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,372
of 228,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JMIR Serious Games
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.