↓ Skip to main content

A nonlinear relationship between genetic diversity and productivity in a polyphagous seed beetle

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A nonlinear relationship between genetic diversity and productivity in a polyphagous seed beetle
Published in
Oecologia, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2893-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. J. Burls, J. Shapiro, M. L. Forister, G. A. Hoelzer

Abstract

There has been a renewed interest in the effects of genetic diversity on population-level and community-level processes. Many of these studies have found non-additive, positive effects of diversity, but these studies have rarely examined ecological mechanisms by which diverse populations increase productivity. We used the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to study genetic diversity in insect host preference and fecundity and its effects on total productivity and resource use. We created genetically distinct lineages that varied in host preference and fecundity and then assembled groups consisting of one, three, five, or all ten lineages. We found that lineages with intermediate diversity had the highest productivity, though resource use did not change in diverse groups. In addition, lineages showed substantial plasticity in host preference when preference was assayed either individually or in groups, and productivity was much lower in groups than predicted by individual assays. These results highlight the interplay of genetic diversity, resource variation, and phenotypic plasticity in determining the ecological consequences of genetic diversity. In addition, when plasticity modifies a population's response to population density, this may create a complex interaction between genetic diversity and density, influencing selective pressures on the population and potentially maintaining genetic diversity across generations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 48%
Environmental Science 6 21%
Computer Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,640
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,627
of 223,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#42
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.