↓ Skip to main content

Education as ehealth infrastructure: considerations in advancing a national agenda for ehealth

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Education as ehealth infrastructure: considerations in advancing a national agenda for ehealth
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10459-013-9442-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonya Hilberts, Kathleen Gray

Abstract

This paper explores the role of education as infrastructure in large-scale ehealth strategies-in theory, in international practice and in one national case study. Education is often invisible in the documentation of ehealth infrastructure. Nevertheless a review of international practice shows that there is significant educational investment made in implementing national ehealth agendas. Disparate views about the role of education are implicit in the ehealth strategy literature, while there is a shortage of evidence-based accounts of ehealth education. In the case of Australia, the benefits and challenges of a broadly collaborative approach to ehealth education are highlighted through activities of various types occurring on many levels to support the implementation of a national ehealth system. This paper concludes that although evidence-based practice is a given in other areas of healthcare, and although there are many published evaluations of ehealth usability and acceptance in the health informatics literature, there is surprisingly little evidence about what works and doesn't work with regard to the ehealth education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Social Sciences 13 14%
Computer Science 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,221,866
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#822
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,231
of 281,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.