↓ Skip to main content

The zebrafish: a new model organism for integrative physiology

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The zebrafish: a new model organism for integrative physiology
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, January 2002
DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.00589.2001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine P Briggs

Abstract

This brief review summarizes features of the zebrafish, Danio rerio, that make it a suitable model organism for studies of regulatory physiology. The review presents the argument that random mutagenesis screens are a valuable gene-finding strategy to identify genes of functional importance and that their utility, although well established for developmental issues, will extend to a variety of topics of interest to the regulatory physiologist. Particular attention is drawn to the range of functional responses amenable to mutagenesis screens in larval zebrafish. Other virtues of the organism, the range of genomic tools, the potential for innovative optical methods, and the tractability for genetic and other experimental manipulations, are also described. Finally, the review provides examples of functional studies in zebrafish, including studies in sensory neurons, cardiac rhythm disturbances, gastrointestinal function, and studies of the developing kidney, that illustrate potential applications. Because of the relative ease with which combinatorial studies can be performed, the zebrafish may eventually be particularly valuable in understanding the functional interaction between subtle gene defects that cause polygenic disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 289 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 23%
Student > Master 54 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Researcher 31 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 4%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 118 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 7%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 66 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#22,830,981
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#2,225
of 2,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,787
of 131,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.