| Title |
An Investigation of Associations Between Clinicians’ Ethnic or Racial Bias and Hypertension Treatment, Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2795-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene V. Blair, John F. Steiner, Rebecca Hanratty, David W. Price, Diane L. Fairclough, Stacie L. Daugherty, Michael Bronsert, David J. Magid, Edward P. Havranek |
| Abstract |
Few studies have directly investigated the association of clinicians' implicit (unconscious) bias with health care disparities in clinical settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 23% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 19% |
| Psychology | 26 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,461,051
of 25,278,281 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,154
of 8,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,305
of 231,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#16
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,278,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.