↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Perceived Control and Overconfidence in Pathological Gambling

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Chapter title
The Role of Perceived Control and Overconfidence in Pathological Gambling
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10899-005-5559-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam S. Goodie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 113 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 20 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,556,449
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#660
of 866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,277
of 147,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.