↓ Skip to main content

A review on comparative data concerning Fusarium mycotoxins in Bt maize and non-Bt isogenic maize

Overview of attention for article published in Mycotoxin Research, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 258)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
A review on comparative data concerning Fusarium mycotoxins in Bt maize and non-Bt isogenic maize
Published in
Mycotoxin Research, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12550-010-0056-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladimir Ostry, Jaroslava Ovesna, Jarmila Skarkova, Vladimira Pouchova, Jiri Ruprich

Abstract

The European corn borer reportedly promotes the infection of maize by Fusarium spp. Stalk and ear rots caused by Fusarium spp. are often related to mycotoxin accumulation in maize kernels. As a result, food and animal feed from maize are more severely contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins: e.g. fumonisins (FUM), deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA). Bt maize is primarily an important potential tool for insect pest protection, both in the European Union and in other countries. Bt maize carrying the Bt genes is highly resistant to European corn borer larval feeding due to Bt toxin (δ toxin) production. Effective measures to combat pests therefore often have a positive side-effect in that they also reduce mycotoxin levels. Comparative analysis was used to the evaluation of the studies dealing with the reduction of Fusarium mycotoxins in Bt maize. Nineteen out of 23 studies on Bt maize came to the conclusion that Bt maize is less contaminated with mycotoxins (FUM, DON, ZEA) than the conventional control variety in each case.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,749,624
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from Mycotoxin Research
#5
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,908
of 98,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycotoxin Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.