| Title |
Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annie McCluskey, Sandy Middleton |
| Abstract |
Transferring knowledge from research into practice can be challenging, partly because the process involves a change in attitudes, roles and behaviour by individuals and teams. Helping teams to identify then target potential barriers may aid the knowledge transfer process. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers, as perceived by allied health professionals, to delivering an evidence-based (Level 1) outdoor journey intervention for people with stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 20% |
| Psychology | 19 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#14,647,929
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,287
of 7,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,649
of 163,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.