↓ Skip to main content

„Beyond antibiotic therapy“ – Zukünftige antiinfektiöse Strategien – Update 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
„Beyond antibiotic therapy“ – Zukünftige antiinfektiöse Strategien – Update 2017
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00113-017-0374-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Vogt, S. Sperling, T. Tkhilaishvili, A. Trampuz, J.-P. Pirnay, C. Willy

Abstract

The key elements in the therapy of surgical site infections (SSI) are surgical debridement and local and systemic antibiotic therapy; however, due to increasing antibiotic resistance, the development of additional therapeutic measures is of great interest for future trauma and orthopedic surgery. Against the background of our own experimental and clinical experiences and on the basis of the current literature, possible future anti-infective strategies were elaborated. Bacteriophages were discovered and clinically implemented approximately one century ago and have been used in Western Europe for about one decade. They are currently used mainly in patients with burn injuries. It is likely that bacteriophages will become of great importance in view of the increasing antibiotic multi-drug resistance; however, they will probably not entirely replace antibiotic drugs. A combined use of bacteriophages and antibiotics is likely to be a more reasonable efficient therapy. In addition, the clinical importance of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) also increases. Up to now the possible use of AMPs is still experimental; however, individual AMPs are already established in the routine therapy (e. g. colistin). Further diagnostic and therapeutic measures may include photodynamic therapy, ultraviolet (UV) light application and differentiated genome analysis as well as the individual metabolism situation (metabolomics) of the pathogen cell and the patient tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 21 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#199
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,852
of 329,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.