↓ Skip to main content

Woodland remnants as an urban wildlife refuge: a cross-taxonomic assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Woodland remnants as an urban wildlife refuge: a cross-taxonomic assessment
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0622-9
Authors

Masashi Soga, Yuichi Yamaura, Shinsuke Koike, Kevin J. Gaston

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 29 22%
Student > Master 23 17%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 44%
Environmental Science 36 27%
Engineering 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Design 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#19,382,126
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,066
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,500
of 312,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.