↓ Skip to main content

Parent Perceptions of Medication Treatment for Preschool Children with ADHD

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Parent Perceptions of Medication Treatment for Preschool Children with ADHD
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10578-017-0737-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie C. Hart, Rosmary Ros, Victoria Gonzalez, Paulo A. Graziano

Abstract

This study sought to examine parent perceptions of medication use for 151 preschool children (M age  = 5.05 years, 78% male, 82% Hispanic/Latino) with or at-risk for ADHD who were medication naive. Parents completed questionnaires regarding family background and perceptions of medication treatment. Parents and teachers completed ratings of child diagnostic symptomatology, behavioral functioning, and functional impairment. Results indicate that only 45% of parents were open to the possibility of medication. No associations were found between child demographics, severity of ADHD symptoms, or level of functional impairment and parental openness to medication. On the other hand, children of parents who were open to medication tended to have higher levels of oppositionality and aggression (as reported by parents but not teachers) compared with children of parents who were not open to medication. These findings are discussed in the context of early intervention given their implications for a variety of treatment providers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 30 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 34 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,414,370
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#576
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,941
of 316,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.