↓ Skip to main content

Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
41 X users
patent
20 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator
bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
644 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Epigenomic alterations define lethal CIMP-positive ependymomas of infancy
Published in
Nature, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 644 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
Japan 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 617 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 131 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 15%
Student > Bachelor 71 11%
Student > Master 58 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 8%
Other 117 18%
Unknown 118 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 176 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 129 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 121 19%
Neuroscience 22 3%
Computer Science 10 2%
Other 53 8%
Unknown 133 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2026.
All research outputs
#553,841
of 32,805,761 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#24,279
of 115,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,256
of 260,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#307
of 974 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,805,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 974 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.