↓ Skip to main content

Convergent Surface Water Distributions in U.S. Cities

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Convergent Surface Water Distributions in U.S. Cities
Published in
Ecosystems, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9751-y
Authors

M. K. Steele, J. B. Heffernan, N. Bettez, J. Cavender-Bares, P. M. Groffman, J. M. Grove, S. Hall, S. E. Hobbie, K. Larson, J. L. Morse, C. Neill, K. C. Nelson, J. O’Neil-Dunne, L. Ogden, D. E. Pataki, C. Polsky, R. Roy Chowdhury

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 32%
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 37 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,345,928
of 23,650,645 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#195
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,384
of 225,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,650,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.