↓ Skip to main content

Elevated risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnant women with depression

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnant women with depression
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00737-013-0371-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah R. Kim, Laura E. Sockol, Mary D. Sammel, Caroline Kelly, Marian Moseley, C. Neill Epperson

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the association between prenatal depression symptoms adverse birth outcomes in African-American women. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 261 pregnant African-American women who were screened with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at their initial prenatal visit. Medical records were reviewed to assess pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, specifically preeclampsia, preterm birth, intrauterine growth retardation, and low birth weight. Using multivariable logistic regression models, an EPDS score ≥10 was associated with increased risk for preeclampsia, preterm birth, and low birth weight. An EPDS score ≥10 was associated with increased risk for intrauterine growth retardation, but after controlling for behavioral risk factors, this association was no longer significant. Patients who screen positive for depression symptoms during pregnancy are at increased risk for multiple adverse birth outcomes. In a positive, patient-rated depression screening at the initial obstetrics visit, depression is associated with increased risk for multiple adverse birth outcomes. Given the retrospective study design and small sample size, these findings should be confirmed in a prospective cohort study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 178 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 30%
Psychology 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 47 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,713,929
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#779
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,930
of 197,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.