↓ Skip to main content

The effects of Psychotropic drugs On Developing brain (ePOD) study: methods and design

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 5,062)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The effects of Psychotropic drugs On Developing brain (ePOD) study: methods and design
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-14-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco A Bottelier, Marieke LJ Schouw, Anne Klomp, Hyke GH Tamminga, Anouk GM Schrantee, Cheima Bouziane, Michiel B de Ruiter, Frits Boer, Henricus G Ruhé, Damiaan Denys, Roselyne Rijsman, Ramon JL Lindauer, Hans B Reitsma, Hilde M Geurts, Liesbeth Reneman

Abstract

Animal studies have shown that methylphenidate (MPH) and fluoxetine (FLX) have different effects on dopaminergic and serotonergic system in the developing brain compared to the developed brain. The effects of Psychotropic drugs On the Developing brain (ePOD) study is a combination of different approaches to determine whether there are related findings in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 221 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 18%
Neuroscience 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 64 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 256. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#133,143
of 24,150,351 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#36
of 5,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,107
of 228,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#1
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,150,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.