↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity and leptospirosis risk: A case of pathogen regulation?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Hypotheses, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biodiversity and leptospirosis risk: A case of pathogen regulation?
Published in
Medical Hypotheses, June 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.05.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bonnie T. Derne, Emily J. Fearnley, Colleen L. Lau, Stuart Paynter, Philip Weinstein

Abstract

Well balanced ecosystems have an essential role in disease regulation, and consequently their correct functioning is increasingly recognised as imperative for maintaining human health. Disruptions to ecosystems have been found to increase the risk of several diseases, including Hantavirus, Lyme disease, Ross River virus, malaria and Ciguatera fish poisoning. Leptospirosis is a globally important emerging zoonosis, caused by spirochaete bacteria, borne by many mammalian hosts, and also transmitted environmentally. We propose that leptospirosis incidence in humans is also linked to ecosystem disruption, and that reduced biodiversity (the diversity of species within an ecological community) may be associated with increased leptospirosis incidence. To investigate this hypothesis, the relationship between biodiversity levels of island nations and their annual leptospirosis incidence rates (adjusted for GDP per capita) was examined by linear correlation and regression. Supportive, statistically significant negative associations were obtained between leptospirosis incidence and (a) total number of species (r2=0.69, p<0.001) and (b) number of mammal species (r2=0.80, p<0.001) in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis only the number of mammal species remained significantly associated (r2=0.81, p=0.007). An association between biodiversity and reduced leptospirosis risk, if supported by further research, would emphasise the importance of managing the emergence of leptospirosis (and other infectious diseases) at a broader, ecosystem level.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
France 2 1%
Colombia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 133 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 37%
Environmental Science 16 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medical Hypotheses
#1,219
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,111
of 124,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Hypotheses
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.