↓ Skip to main content

BLSの長期定着の検証 ―病院内急変対応のシステム化に向けて―

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BLSの長期定着の検証 ―病院内急変対応のシステム化に向けて―
Published in
Transactions of Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education, January 2014
DOI 10.14926/jsise.31.105
Authors

増山 純二, 久保田 真一郎, 北村 士朗, 鈴木 克明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education
#20
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,888
of 319,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them