You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marita Cross, Emma Smith, Damian Hoy, Sandra Nolte, Ilana Ackerman, Marlene Fransen, Lisa Bridgett, Sean Williams, Francis Guillemin, Catherine L Hill, Laura L. Laslett, Graeme Jones, Flavia Cicuttini, Richard Osborne, Theo Vos, Rachelle Buchbinder, Anthony Woolf, Lyn March |
| Abstract |
To estimate the global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) as part of the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study and to explore how the burden of hip and knee OA compares with other conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2304 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 330 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 316 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 291 | 13% |
| Researcher | 220 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 132 | 6% |
| Other | 380 | 16% |
| Unknown | 656 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 661 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 218 | 9% |
| Engineering | 144 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 89 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 77 | 3% |
| Other | 331 | 14% |
| Unknown | 805 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#441,605
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#172
of 7,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,838
of 242,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#7
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.