↓ Skip to main content

Loss of a large grazer impacts savanna grassland plant communities similarly in North America and South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Loss of a large grazer impacts savanna grassland plant communities similarly in North America and South Africa
Published in
Oecologia, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-2895-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie Eby, Deron E. Burkepile, Richard W. S. Fynn, Catherine E. Burns, Navashni Govender, Nicole Hagenah, Sally E. Koerner, Katherine J. Matchett, Dave I. Thompson, Kevin R. Wilcox, Scott L. Collins, Kevin P. Kirkman, Alan K. Knapp, Melinda D. Smith

Abstract

Large herbivore grazing is a widespread disturbance in mesic savanna grasslands which increases herbaceous plant community richness and diversity. However, humans are modifying the impacts of grazing on these ecosystems by removing grazers. A more general understanding of how grazer loss will impact these ecosystems is hampered by differences in the diversity of large herbivore assemblages among savanna grasslands, which can affect the way that grazing influences plant communities. To avoid this we used two unique enclosures each containing a single, functionally similar large herbivore species. Specifically, we studied a bison (Bos bison) enclosure at Konza Prairie Biological Station, USA and an African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) enclosure in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Within these enclosures we erected exclosures in annually burned and unburned sites to determine how grazer loss would impact herbaceous plant communities, while controlling for potential fire-grazing interactions. At both sites, removal of the only grazer decreased grass and forb richness, evenness and diversity, over time. However, in Kruger these changes only occurred with burning. At both sites, changes in plant communities were driven by increased dominance with herbivore exclusion. At Konza, this was caused by increased abundance of one grass species, Andropogon gerardii, while at Kruger, three grasses, Themeda triandra, Panicum coloratum, and Digitaria eriantha increased in abundance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Argentina 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 110 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 42%
Environmental Science 34 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,640
of 4,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,733
of 224,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#38
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.