↓ Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of daratumumab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Safety and efficacy of daratumumab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation study
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12185-017-2281-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinsuke Iida, Kenshi Suzuki, Shigeru Kusumoto, Masaki Ri, Nobuhiro Tsukada, Yu Abe, Masayuki Aoki, Mitsuo Inagaki

Abstract

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of daratumumab as a monotherapy were investigated in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). This multicenter, dose-escalation study included patients (age ≥20 years) with ≥2 prior therapies. Daratumumab was administered intravenously: 8 mg/kg (n = 4) and 16 mg/kg (n = 5). The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included objective response, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), PK, and immunogenicity. Daratumumab was well-tolerated. Eight patients experienced Grade ≥3 adverse event (AE). Four serious AEs were observed in three patients; no AEs leading to death. Infusion-related reactions occurred in four (44%) patients and were Grade 1 or 2. Mean (SD) cumulative dose of daratumumab was 132.3 (108.5) mg/kg. Median duration of follow-up was 10.5 months (range 2.3, 16.4) for 8 mg/kg cohort and 9.9 months (range 1.7, 13.2) for 16 mg/kg cohort. The ORR (44%) comprised 1 and 3 partial responses in 8 and 16 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. The median PFS was 6 months for 8 mg/kg cohort, 9.5 months for 16 mg/kg cohort. Daratumumab serum exposure was increased with increasing dose. Antibodies against daratumumab were not observed. Daratumumab was safe and well-tolerated in Japanese patients with relapsed /refractory MM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 23%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Engineering 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,299,839
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#909
of 1,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,359
of 317,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.