| Title |
Pirouettes: the rotational play of wild chimpanzees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10329-009-0157-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshisada Nishida, Agumi Inaba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 28% |
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 44% |
| Psychology | 8 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,466,074
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#837
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,335
of 109,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.