↓ Skip to main content

The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
447 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
492 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsa Dent, Christopher Lien, Wee Shiong Lim, Wei Chin Wong, Chek Hooi Wong, Tze Pin Ng, Jean Woo, Birong Dong, Shelley de la Vega, Philip Jun Hua Poi, Shahrul Bahyah Binti Kamaruzzaman, Chang Won, Liang-Kung Chen, Kenneth Rockwood, Hidenori Arai, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas, Li Cao, Matteo Cesari, Piu Chan, Edward Leung, Francesco Landi, Linda P. Fried, John E. Morley, Bruno Vellas, Leon Flicker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 492 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 10%
Researcher 45 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Other 35 7%
Other 86 17%
Unknown 178 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Social Sciences 12 2%
Other 59 12%
Unknown 210 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,715,192
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#386
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,456
of 329,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#13
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.