↓ Skip to main content

Devosia nitraria sp. nov., a novel species isolated from the roots of Nitraria sibirica in China

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Devosia nitraria sp. nov., a novel species isolated from the roots of Nitraria sibirica in China
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10482-017-0901-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Xu, Yong Zhang, Nicholas Read, Shuangjiang Liu, Ville-Petri Friman

Abstract

An aerobic, Gram-stain negative, short rod-shaped and motile strain, 36-5-1(T), was isolated from the roots of Nitraria sibirica in Zhangye city, Gansu province, north-west of China. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence and two housekeeping genes (glnA and atpD) indicated that the strain represents a novel species closely related to the Devosia, Rhizobium and Devosia genera with 98.3, 96.2 and 91.1% similarities, respectively. The strain 36-5-1(T) contained Q-10 as the predominant ubiquinone and 16:0 (36.8%) as the major fatty acid; a large amount of unidentified glycolipid, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol and a small amount of unidentified polar lipids were present as polar lipids. In addition, the G+C content of the genomic DNA was 61.7 mol% and the DNA-DNA hybridization with type strains Devosia geojensis BD-c194(T) and Devosia pacifica NH131(T) 44.1 ± 1.1 and 40.2 ± 1.7, respectively. Based on chemotaxonomic data and molecular properties, strain 36-5-1(T) represents a novel species within the genus Devosia, for which the name Devosia nitraria sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 36-5-1(T) (=CGMCC1.15704(T)=NBRC112416(T)).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,371,244
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#345
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,713
of 317,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.