You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A professionalism and safety code of conduct designed for undergraduate nursing students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Professional Nursing, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.06.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadia Ali Muhammad Ali Charania, Diane L. Ferguson, Esther Bay, Barbara S. Freeland, Kimberly Bradshaw, Karen Harden |
| Abstract |
Nationally, professionalism and safety are key concepts in nursing practice. Although they are traditionally viewed as individual concepts, we believe they are closely linked to and depend on one another. Herein, professionalism and safety are developed as a paired concept with specific indicators. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process used to develop and implement a professionalism and safety Code of Conduct for undergraduate nursing students and to share the end product of this process. Based on input from students, faculty, and health system partners in our academic-service partnership, the current definition and Code include six student behavioral domains: communication, self-awareness, self-care, professional image, responsible learning, and personal accountability. Our Code of Conduct is now a program policy and published in both the Student Handbook and clinical syllabi. Compliance is expected. Still under development are progressive clinical grading rubrics for inclusion in every clinical course. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 25% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,476,767
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Professional Nursing
#164
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,447
of 329,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Professional Nursing
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.