↓ Skip to main content

Neuroradiology of Cholesteatomas

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroradiology of Cholesteatomas
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, April 2010
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a2052
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Baráth, A.M. Huber, P. Stämpfli, Z. Varga, S. Kollias

Abstract

The relevant aspects of cholesteatomas are reviewed with the emphasis on their diagnosis by using cross-sectional imaging. The indications and limitations of CT and MR imaging and the use of novel MR imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cholesteatomas are described. HRCT of the temporal bone has an excellent spatial resolution, thus even small soft-tissue lesions can be accurately delineated (high sensitivity). However, CT has poor specificity (ie, soft-tissue structures cannot be differentiated). MR imaging with the conventional sequences (T1WI, T2WI, postcontrast T1WI) provides additional information for distinguishing different pathologic entities and for accurately diagnosing primary (nonsurgical) and residual/recurrent (surgical) cholesteatomas. Higher diagnostic specificity is achieved by introducing DW-EPI, delayed postcontrast imaging, DW-non-EPI, and DWI-PROPELLER techniques. Studies using DW-non-EPI and DWI-PROPELLER sequences show promising results related to improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for even small (<5 mm) cholesteatomas, thus allowing avoidance of second-look surgery in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 41 17%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 7%
Other 58 24%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 63%
Engineering 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 52 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,525,703
of 23,380,821 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,684
of 4,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,904
of 97,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,380,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.